Telecoms Capital Importation Reduces by 94%
The capital importation of companies operating in the telecommunication industry has reduced drastically in the second quarter of 2018 compared with the same quarter of last year. A careful appraisal of the second quarter 2018 capital importation report published by the National Bureau of Statistics indicated that there was a 94 per cent reduction in capital importation year-on-year. In the second quarter of 2017, the total value of capital inflow into the country was $174.18m as against $11.12m in the second quarter of this year.
Quarter-on-quarter, there was also a 93 per cent reduction in capital inflow into the country, from $166.68m recorded from January to March this year to $11.12m between April and June. The report stated that Nigeria’s telecommunication sector only accounted for 0.2 per cent out the $5.5bn capital inflow into the country in the second quarter of this year. The study divided capital importation into three main investment types: portfolio investment, Foreign Direct Investment and other investments such as trade credit and loan. Commenting on the report, the President, Association of Telecommunication Operators of Nigeria, Olusola Teniola, said the telecoms sector was largely dependent on equipment, funding and skills from other countries.
According to him, moves by the Federal government to diversify the economic will not in any way reduce the dependency of operators in the sectors on the FDI. “When you see the macroeconomic change, it is much more acute in our industry because operators depend heavily on imports. Even though the government wants to diversify the economy and increase manufacturing, it does not change the fact that our industry in near and medium term will still require importation of foreign equipment to drive it,” Teniola said. He added, “Nigeria will not automatically change from exporting oil to exporting telecoms equipment. It can’t happen overnight. The reality is that the telecoms industry is an enabler of all other sectors. If we are not seeing the FDI coming in, it means the sector has remained flat; the consumer has weak spending power; they are not making as many calls as before and not recharging as much as before.” Teniola said the capital importation report reflected the economic performance in which only oil export still had significant impact on the GDP than non-oil export. He said, “The impact is being demonstrated in the GDP which has not increased significantly, and it is only being heavily contributed by oil export receipts. That is one of the reasons why we have this small increase in the GDP growth.”
The ATCON president warned that there would be further reduction in capital importation if stakeholders did not ensure that there was more FDI to inject in the non-oil sector.